To wit: despite that public religion discourse surrounding abortion, the Dobbs Court analysis took religionas so marginal to its analysis that the term, on its own, never actually appears in its opinions.[14]Rather, the question I’m concerned with here is whether or how we might think about doctrines (especially with the questions placed on stare decisis) that might better recognize a diversity of opinions even if one reigns supreme, while ensuring the rule of law. [read post]